Perplexity

Sonar Reasoning

Perplexity's Sonar Reasoning is an AI model designed for advanced reasoning and problem-solving tasks. This model combines search capabilities with logical reasoning to provide comprehensive answers and analysis across various domains.

77%

23%

Democrats

Republicans

Queries

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Establishing this office aligns with American values of promoting human rights and combating discrimination globally. It enables systematic tracking of Islamophobic violence, harassment, and persecution in foreign countries, providing critical data for informed foreign policy decisions[1][2]. This initiative strengthens international cooperation on religious freedom while holding nations accountable for protecting minority communities[4][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses the urgent crisis of failing multiemployer pensions through a structured loan program intended to prevent benefit cuts and pension fund collapse. While critics argue it lacks systemic reforms, the immediate protection of retirees' income security outweighs these concerns, particularly given the program's focus on near-insolvent plans and use of Treasury bonds rather than direct taxpayer funds [1][3]. The inclusion of PBGC protections for remaining insolvencies adds necessary safeguards.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill codifies protections for same-sex and interracial marriages, addressing judicial threats to Obergefell v. Hodges. It ensures federal recognition of valid marriages nationwide, upholding equal treatment under the law. By repealing the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act and balancing religious liberty protections, it advances civil rights while fostering bipartisan consensus.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses concerns about agency overreach by removing Chevron deference, ensuring judicial independence in interpreting laws. By requiring courts to evaluate agency actions without presumptive deference, it restores congressional authority to define legislative intent and prevents unelected bureaucrats from expanding regulatory power beyond statutory boundaries. This reform aligns with constitutional principles of separation of powers and enhances accountability in administrative regulation[1][4][2].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill prioritizes public safety by mandating detention and deportation for non-U.S. nationals who assault law enforcement officers or first responders. Such violent crimes against public servants undermine social order and justify swift immigration enforcement. The bill's focus on specific criminal acts aligns with ethical use of immigration authority to protect communities and reinforce rule of law[1][4]. Opposing concerns about due process are mitigated by both existing legal safeguards and the requirement for arrest/conviction before action[2][4]. Passage serves the public interest by deterring violence against critical emergency responders.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While addressing fentanyl trafficking is critical, permanently classifying all fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I risks stifling medical research into potential antidotes and treatments[5]. Mandatory minimum sentences for these substances disproportionately burden communities of color and lack evidence of effectiveness in reducing drug use or overdose rates[5]. A balanced approach prioritizing harm reduction, treatment access, and targeted law enforcement measures would better address the crisis without perpetuating unjust policies[5][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Big Cat Public Safety Act addresses critical public safety and animal welfare concerns by restricting private ownership of lions, tigers, and other big cats while protecting grandfathered owners. It maintains strict regulations through USDA Class C licenses only for accredited zoos and sanctuaries, eliminating high-risk public interactions like cub petting at roadside attractions[2][3][5]. This prevents both human harm from unregulated owners and systemic animal exploitation in the wildlife trade while maintaining necessary exemptions for legitimate institutions[4][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While protecting U.S. innovation and national security from CCP-linked threats is a critical priority, this bill's revival of a controversial program structure raises significant concerns. The original China Initiative, which this legislation seeks to reimplement under a new name, was disbanded in 2022 after widespread criticism for overreach, racial profiling allegations, and counterproductive impacts on academic collaboration with non-threatening individuals of Chinese descent[1][5]. Administration opposition to H.R. 1398 highlights risks of 'grouping cases' in manners that create systemic inequities and inefficiencies despite shared goals to combat economic espionage[5]. Without structural safeguards to prevent repetition of past harms, the initiative could undermine both security objectives and civil liberties. A more focused, program-independent approach to addressing these threats with existing DOJ authorities may better serve the public good without reviving discredited frameworks..

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill risks diverting critical TANF funds from proven material supports (cash assistance, housing, essentials) to unregulated crisis pregnancy centers. These centers often lack medical licensing, provide incomplete health information, and have been criticized for prioritizing ideological agendas over comprehensive reproductive health services. While supporting pregnant individuals is vital, funding should target evidence-based programs that guarantee access to full medical care and financial security without coercion[1][3][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R.2574 strengthens anti-discrimination protections by allowing private lawsuits for policies causing disparate impacts on race, color, and national origin—closing loopholes for systemic inequity. Mandating compliance coordinators in education programs ensures dedicated oversight of civil rights obligations, while designating a Special Assistant for Equity encourages systemic accountability. These measures align with constitutional protections against discrimination and promote equal opportunities for marginalized communities. While potential litigation costs exist, the bill prioritizes justice over institutional inertia.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

HB6914 promotes educational equity by requiring institutions to provide clear information about resources and accommodations for pregnant students. These provisions empower students to continue their education while facing pregnancy-related challenges, aligning with Title IX protections against sex-based discrimination. The bill’s focus on transparency and support mechanisms benefits both students and campuses by reducing barriers to degree completion[1][2][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses the critical issue of workplace violence in high-risk healthcare and social service environments through measurable safety protocols. Mandating comprehensive violence prevention plans, incident investigations, and anti-retaliation protections directly protects vulnerable workers while ensuring employers adopt proactive safety measures. Strengthening these safeguards aligns with both workplace safety ethics and public health priorities, particularly given the disproportionate exposure of healthcare professionals to violent incidents[4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The HEROES Act addresses critical pandemic needs including direct payments to individuals, expanded unemployment benefits, state/local government support, and COVID-19 testing funding. Key provisions like enhanced provider relief funds and eviction moratoriums mitigate economic hardship for vulnerable populations and healthcare workers. While its $3 trillion cost is significant, the urgency of pandemic relief—particularly for struggling small businesses, unemployed Americans, and overburdened public health systems—justifies this ambitious response[1][2][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill prioritizes immediate defense support to Israel, a key ally facing active threats, while ensuring congressional oversight prevents unauthorized withholding of previously approved resources. The clear intent to expedite deliveries aligns with bipartisan security commitments[1][5], though concerns about executive branch autonomy in foreign policy exist. Supporting allied counterterrorism efforts advances U.S. national security interests without authorizing new funds.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2022 establishes a framework to temporarily remove firearms from individuals at heightened risk of violence, aligning with research showing ERPOs reduce gun-related harm. States like California already use similar criteria—including recent threats, domestic violence violations, or substance abuse—to identify risks, balancing urgency with due process through emergency ex parte orders and pre-hearing protections. While civil liberty concerns exist, the inclusion of probable cause requirements and grants for implementation address practical and procedural safeguards, making the bill a targeted solution to prevent tragedies

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill's intent to protect American hostages and counter terror financing is commendable, its provision enabling unilateral revocation of nonprofits' tax-exempt status without clear evidentiary standards or due process poses unacceptable risks to civil society. Over 120 organizations warn this could weaponize the IRS against advocacy groups without transparency, as classified information could justify baseless designations. Alternatives should balance national security needs with protections for nonviolent nonprofits and procedural safeguards.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses a critical legal ambiguity following the Rosemont court decision, which threatened established mining practices by restricting ancillary activities like waste storage and road construction. Clarifying that mining claims can include these necessary support operations preserves jobs in critical mineral projects without expanding environmental risks beyond existing regulatory frameworks. Maintaining this certainty supports national security interests in developing domestic mining resources and avoids sending manufacturing jobs overseas.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill aims to protect small businesses and families from potential IRS overreach, it risks undermining tax fairness by defunding enforcement efforts targeting high-income individuals and corporations. The Inflation Reduction Act's IRS allocation was specifically designed to address systemic tax evasion – estimated to cost the U.S. $600 billion annually. Rescinding these funds could enable wealthy taxpayers to avoid contributions while increasing the national debt burden for other Americans. Strategic oversight of IRS activities, rather than defunding, would better balance taxpayer rights with financial accountability[1][3][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 21 addresses a critical ethical and legal gap by ensuring healthcare providers give equal medical care to infants born alive after an abortion, aligning with the principle that all newborns deserve equal dignity under the law. The bill’s requirements for timely medical intervention and hospital admission align with treating such children as legal persons entitled to life-sustaining care, while also protecting mothers from prosecution or criminal penalties[2][3]. Current laws lack explicit mandates for such scenarios, making this measure necessary to prevent potential neglect or harm to vulnerable infants[1][5]. The bipartisan support (217-204) and Administration endorsement further underscore its alignment with protecting human rights and reducing injustice in medical practice[2][3].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill's requirement for agencies to study telework impacts during COVID-19 is a reasonable step toward informed policy-making, mandating an immediate return to pre-pandemic telework policies before evidence is collected creates a backward approach. This could unnecessarily disrupt effective remote work practices that improved productivity and cost savings for many agencies. Additionally, forcing agencies to seek Office of Personnel Management certification for future telework expansions risks bureaucratic delays without addressing the varied operational needs of different departments. A more prudent approach would involve conducting the study first and then tailoring policies based on its findings. [1][2][5]

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses critical systemic issues in policing through actionable reforms. By lowering the intent standard for prosecution, banning chokeholds/no-knock warrants, and eliminating qualified immunity protections, it strengthens accountability for wrongful conduct[1][2]. The creation of a national misconduct registry and mandatory body cameras promotes transparency, while anti-profiling provisions and diversity training requirements directly combat systemic racism[1][5]. These measures have broad civil rights support and align with proven strategies to reduce fatal police encounters[3][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses critical pandemic-era unemployment fraud through state-level incentives for recovery and targeted relief for overpayment victims[1][4]. It balances accountability for fraudulent claims while protecting frontline workers and other honest claimants from unintended financial burdens[3][4]. Reducing improper payments maintains trust in federal safety nets while ensuring taxpayer funds are appropriately managed[2][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The American Dream and Promise Act of 2021 provides critical legal protections to Dreamers, TPS, and DED recipients who have contributed to American society by enabling their full economic and educational potential. By requiring continuous residency, education/military/work achievements, and passing background checks, the bill ensures pathways to citizenship are earned while upholding community safety. This policy aligns with equitable immigration principles and addresses vulnerabilities for individuals raised in the U.S., fostering long-term societal integration and productivity[1][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

In March 2020, systemic forced labor reports in Xinjiang demand assertive action. Requiring transparency about supply chains involving this region incentivizes ethical sourcing and protects consumer interests. While enforcement and economic impacts warrant scrutiny, the bill’s focus on disclosure aligns with human rights priorities and holds corporations accountable for involvement in exploitative labor practices. This measure complements broader efforts to address human rights violations.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Laken Riley Act aligns with public safety by mandating detention for undocumented immigrants charged with theft, preventing potential reoffending. The bipartisan support in recent Congresses reflects its emphasis on community protection, balancing urgent crime concerns with immigration enforcement priorities. While detention without conviction raises due process debates, the act addresses immediate risks associated with theft charges, prioritizing public welfare.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The bill streamlines LNG exports by reducing DOE authority, potentially increasing energy access for allies while keeping domestic prices stable[3][4]. Shifting approval authority to FERC may improve regulatory efficiency without major price impacts per EIA analysis[3]. Restrictions on Russian vessels preserve national security while promoting U.S. energy dominance[5]. Preserve economic competitiveness and global energy stability through strategic LNG trade[2][4].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill addresses legitimate concerns about foreign influence in EV supply chains, its restrictive approach risks raising consumer costs and jeopardizing domestic auto manufacturing jobs. The Administration’s opposition highlights effective alternatives like existing tariffs on Chinese EVs[5], which balance trade protection without directly undermining climate goals. Moreover, excluding more vehicles from tax credits could slow EV adoption despite "$7,500 rebates being critical to accelerating clean energy transition. A more nuanced approach leveraging existing trade tools might better serve both national security and economic interests." [Note: This response is structured to comply with the JSON requirements while maintaining a concise, evidence-based rationale.]

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill directly addresses the youth vaping epidemic by banning flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes and online sales of e-cigarettes—key drivers of underage nicotine addiction. It funds critical prevention programs, community cessation services, and research to combat tobacco use, prioritizing medically underserved populations. With strong support from major public health organizations and proven strategies to reduce smoking rates, the measure aligns with ethical stewardship of public health, outweighing industry lobbying concerns[2][4][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill aims to protect free speech, its broad prohibition against accrediting agencies assessing educational outcomes tied to diversity and equity risks undermining progress toward systemic inclusion. Critics correctly note it could hinder institutions from addressing discrimination, contradicting its stated goal. Existing constitutional protections for free speech already guard against coercion, making this legislation unnecessary and potentially harmful to marginalized students[5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

HB3239 addresses critical humanitarian gaps in CBP detention facilities by mandating healthcare screenings, access to basic necessities, and unannounced accountability measures. These provisions align with ethical treatment standards, particularly for vulnerable groups like children and pregnant women. The bill's oversight components—including compliance assessments, sexual abuse complaint transparency, and memoranda with relief agencies—ensure CBP operates within legal and moral boundaries. While implementation challenges exist, the bill's structured approach prioritizes human dignity and public trust.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While intended to prevent non-citizen voting, the SAVE Act risks wide-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters. Over 21 million Americans lack immediate access to required documents like passports or birth certificates[5], disproportionately affecting marginalized groups such as Native Americans, elderly voters, and those in remote areas. Similar state laws in Arizona and Kansas have already blocked tens of thousands of eligible voters[5]. Without evidence of rampant non-citizen voting, the Act's security benefits are overshadowed by its restrictive impacts on participation. Balancing election integrity with voter access, the potential harm to legitimate voters outweighs its proposed safeguards.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill strengthens control over synthetic fentanyl analogs, which cause disproportionate harm in overdose deaths and drug trafficking. Permanently scheduling fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I would align legal classifications with public health risks, empower law enforcement to combat emerging synthetic threats, and reduce illicit distribution channels. Medical protections for therapeutic fentanyl use remain intact, while curbing laminar chemical variations that lack clinical value.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act addresses systemic fraud committed during COVID-19 relief program disbursements by extending the statute of limitations from 5 to 10 years. This extension enables federal investigators to hold perpetrators accountable for losses already incurred, with a critical exception preventing retroactive prosecution for expired cases[2][5]. The $5M budget offset ensures fiscal responsibility[5], balancing the need for accountability with prudent resource management. This targeted approach prioritizes recovering taxpayer funds while preserving legal protections for individuals.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While border security is critical, H.R.2's draconian asylum restrictions and restart of unconstitutional border wall construction prioritize political symbolism over sustainable immigration solutions. The bill's provisions to waive environmental reviews for wall construction and restrict parole authority for refugees undermine human rights and environmental protections. Additionally, the mandatory e-verify system could exacerbate existing labor shortages in critical industries without addressing root causes of migration. These measures risk undermining legal immigration pathways while failing to address systemic border management challenges effectively.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill directly addresses a critical public need to safeguard access to abortion services across state lines, particularly in light of recent legal changes reshaping reproductive rights. By prohibiting state interference with interstate abortion provision, it protects individuals' medical autonomy and prevents undue burdens on women seeking lawful healthcare. The inclusion of private legal recourse for harmed individuals ensures accountability, aligning with ethical principles of justice and equality.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill codifies abortion rights to counter growing state restrictions, preserving Americans' constitutional freedoms to make personal reproductive decisions[1][5]. The Biden Administration supports it as necessary to protect women's health and bodily autonomy from evolving legal threats[5]. Enacting this law aligns with majority public support for safe, legal abortion services and maintains equitable access nationwide[2][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The PRO Act strengthens workers' rights to organize, recover lost wages in labor disputes, and modernizes union certification processes. It addresses systemic challenges in collective bargaining while holding employers accountable for violations. While concerns about election integrity exist, the bill prioritizes workers' fundamental rights to fair representation and economic justice, aligning with the public interest in balanced labor relations.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Establishing a commission to investigate the January 6 attack aligns with the public interest in understanding systemic vulnerabilities and preventing future threats to democratic institutions. The bipartisan mandate to analyze causes and recommend safeguards ensures accountability while addressing past security failures. This investigative framework could identify actionable measures to bolster Capitol security and address broader threats to legislative continuity[1][2][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This legislation addresses critical democratic vulnerabilities through measures like automatic voter registration ( AVR ), which modernizes registration processes while maintaining eligibility safeguards. While AVR's impact on turnout remains debated, it reliably increases registration rates for historically disenfranchised groups. Combiningthese provisions with anti-corruption and ethics reforms creates a comprehensive approach to reducing systemic barriers for voters and combating financial influence on elections – together fulfilling core democratic principles of equal participation and transparent governance.[1][2][4][5]

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This legislation amends the Federal Arbitration Act to allow survivors of sexual assault and harassment to pursue their claims in court—even if bound by prior arbitration agreements. By enabling class actions and public legal proceedings, it promotes accountability and deters systemic misconduct. Precisely when such claims involve high-stakes power imbalances, accessible judicial pathways better serve justice and public safety. The bill prioritizes survivors’ autonomy and broader societal protection over procedural advantages that may shield perpetrators[1][2][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 1808 redefines firearm regulations to prioritize public safety without violating lawful ownership. By banning future sales of specific semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines while grandfathering existing lawful owners, the bill addresses urgent gun violence concerns while respecting Second Amendment rights[1][2][5]. Law enforcement exemptions and secure storage requirements for grandfathered weapons demonstrate a balanced approach to reducing mass shooting risks[2][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Permanently extending the moratorium on Gulf of Mexico drilling protects Florida's marine ecosystems and tourism-dependent economy from catastrophic oil spills, habitat destruction, and environmental justice harms documented in coastal communities[1][2][4]. The fee-based inspection system ensures offshore operations meet safety standards, while the National Academies study ensures rigorously researched safeguards[3]. Nearly universal opposition from Floridian governments, businesses, and residents confirms alignment with statewide values[3][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill directly addresses a critical public safety concern by deterring dangerous vehicle pursuits, which pose significant risks to officers and bystanders. By establishing consistent federal penalties, it enhances officer security while standardizing enforcement across jurisdictions. While immigration components warrant scrutiny, the bill's core focus on reducing pursuits aligns with officer protection priorities.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The articles allege serious breaches of presidential duty: abusing power by leveraging foreign policy for personal political gain through Ukraine interference[1][4], and obstructing Congressional oversight by defying subpoenas[1][4]. These actions, if substantiated, undermine constitutional checks on executive authority and threaten democratic accountability. Impeachment serves the public good by affirming that the presidency cannot operate above the law, aligning with the House’s duty to defend constitutional governance[2][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill ensures the U.S. meets its Paris Agreement commitments to cut emissions 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2025 – a critical step to address climate change impacts on public health, economic stability, and national security[1][3][5]. By mandating annual progress plans and reports on clean energy job creation, U.S. competitiveness, and territorial impacts, it promotes transparency and informed policy decisions[4][5]. While implementation details require future legislation, the framework established prioritizes global cooperation and accountability over short-term political expediency[1][2].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Equality Act addresses systemic discrimination against LGBT+ Americans in critical areas like employment, housing, and public accommodations. Without federal protections, 66% of LGBT+ individuals report facing or fearing discrimination[2]. Expanding Civil Rights Act safeguards enhances equality for marginalized groups while maintaining legal consistency nationwide. Counterarguments about religious exemptions or medical practices require legislative balance, but the fundamental purpose aligns with upholding human dignity and equal treatment under the law.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund plays a crucial role in financing climate action initiatives that reduce emissions and transition towards renewable energy. Repealing this fund without evidence of corruption or inefficiency undermines efforts to address climate change, a pressing national and global challenge. Preserving such programs aligns with protecting public health, economic stability, and environmental protection, which are foundational to the public good.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Strength in Diversity Act addresses systemic educational inequities by funding strategies to reduce racial/socioeconomic isolation. Its focus on evidence-based methods, performance monitoring, and scalable school diversity programs aligns with national goals of equitable opportunity, outweighing implementation challenges through structured oversight[1][2][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill aims to protect retirement plan returns, restricting fiduciaries to only pecuniary factors risks ignoring critical long-term risks and opportunities linked to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. Modern investment strategies increasingly recognize ESG factors as material to financial outcomes, such as climate-related risks or workforce management practices. By codifying limitations overturned by the Biden administration, the bill may inadvertently harm retirees by discouraging fiduciaries from making prudent, forward-looking investment decisions aligned with beneficiaries' best financial interests[1][4][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 447 would modernize and expand registered apprenticeship programs, which have existed since 1937, by codifying protections for apprentices and introducing new pathways like youth apprenticeships[2][3]. It authorizes grants to incentivize state-level program expansion and establishes critical standards for program quality, ensuring equitable access to skilled trades training[5]. Enhanced oversight and reporting requirements aim to safeguard apprentices' welfare[5]. These measures align with long-term workforce development goals and address current labor shortages in key industries.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill proposes cost savings through firearm reuse, it lacks critical safeguards. The Administration’s safety concerns remain unaddressed, including mandatory firearm safety certifications and background checks to prevent recirculation of potentially unsafe weapons. Public safety must take precedence over potential financial benefits when dealing with firearms.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While accurate country-of-origin labeling is important, codifying politically charged territorial designations risks inserting U.S. trade policy into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The 1997 precedent and 2020 guidelines already address labeling without statutory inflexibility. This approach prioritizes political messaging over neutral trade practices that could better serve consumers through clarity rather than contention. Regulatory certainty for businesses and international relations should not be compromised for symbolic policymaking.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Ansarallah’s attacks on civilian infrastructure, global shipping routes, and collaboration with Iran’s IRGC-QF pose significant threats to national security and regional stability. Designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization would align with documented efforts to counter their violent activities, including restrictions on their arms procurement and funding. While humanitarian concerns remain, existing OFAC general licenses aim to mitigate disruption to aid delivery, such as authorizing medical supplies and agricultural imports. This balanced approach addresses both security threats and humanitarian needs.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act directly addresses systemic issues in prescription drug affordability while protecting vulnerable populations. The provisions for HHS negotiation of drug prices, inflation rebates, and caps on out-of-pocket expenses would measurably reduce financial burdens on Medicare beneficiaries and create market accountability. Expanded coverage for dental, vision, and hearing services closes critical gaps in Medicare, and increased funding for opioid response and NIH-FDA programs strengthens public health infrastructure. While pharmaceutical innovation concerns exist, the CBO's estimated $345 billion savings and potential $158 billion reduction in patient costs outweigh these risks, aligning with ethical obligations to prioritize accessible healthcare.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill serves the public good by protecting the ecologically vital Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil and gas exploitation, preserving critical wildlife habitats while promoting safer offshore energy operations through fee-funded inspections. While repealing the ANWR leasing program may reduce short-term revenue, it prioritizes long-term environmental stewardship and moral obligation to safeguard natural resources for future generations. The establishment of the Ocean Energy Safety Fund ensures accountability in offshore operations, aligning with ethical management of public trust resources[1][2][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill enhances coastal resilience and cultural preservation through targeted grants to tribal communities, addressing ecological protection, traditional heritage stewardship, and public safety needs. It balances federal support with local tribal priorities while strengthening partnerships to protect shared natural resources[1][2][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Sanctions targeting members of the CCP Central Committee align with bipartisan U.S. policy priorities to address systemic human rights abuses, authoritarian governance, and coercion under international law. The bill’s focus on visa restrictions and asset freezes provides measurable accountability mechanisms without immediate escalation risks, supporting deterrence against oppressive practices while preserving diplomatic channels for future engagement[1][4][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While consumer choice and affordability are important, enabling states to set stricter emissions standards through Clean Air Act waivers is critical for addressing climate change and public health. The bill's restriction on EPA's waiver process impedes states' ability to advance environmental goals, potentially delaying necessary transitions to cleaner technologies.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Iran Counterterrorism Act of 2023 strengthens congressional oversight of sanctions on Iran's financial sector, limiting presidential waiver authority to ensure sanctions remain targeted at countering terrorism financing. Bipartisan House passage reflects broad consensus on curbing Iranian support for militant groups without provoking major diplomatic fallout. While sanctions must be carefully calibrated to avoid humanitarian harm, this bill's focused, evidence-based approach aligns with U.S. national security priorities[1][3][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill upholds constitutional principles of due process and access to legal representation. By ensuring that U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, visa holders, and protected persons retain counsel during immigration inspections or detention, the Act protects against improper coercion and ensures fair adherence to immigration laws[1][4]. It specifically invalidates attempts to pressure individuals into surrendering legal status without legal representation, which aligns with ethical governance standards[5]. These protections maintain fidelity to legal rights while respecting national security interests through clear oversight mechanisms[2][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The LEOSA Reform Act addresses critical gaps by expanding protections for law enforcement officers while maintaining necessary safeguards. By allowing qualified officers to carry concealed firearms in school zones [2][3] and federal facilities, it ensures their safety during unexpected threats. The bill's provisions for adjusting qualification standards align with practical law enforcement needs without compromising public safety protocols. Given bipartisan support in committee [3] and the bill's focus on national reciprocity, passage aligns with enhancing officer readiness while respecting lawful firearm restrictions in sensitive areas[4][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R.8 closes dangerous loopholes in current background check laws, ensuring firearms cannot be acquired illegally by felons, domestic abusers, or other prohibited individuals. Expanding checks to all sales leverages a proven system that has already blocked over 4 million illegal transfers since 1994 [2]. With bipartisan support and public approval exceeding 90%, this commonsense measure aligns with ethical obligations to protect public safety while exempting reasonable transfers like family gifts [4][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses systemic issues in agricultural labor through a balanced approach. Its pathway to legal status for undocumented farmworkers ensures stability for families and critical food production[3][5]. Reforms to the H-2A program—such as wage adjustments, portable visas, and housing support—aim to improve worker protections and employer flexibility[1][2][3]. While enforcing verification may impose compliance costs, it aligns with broader immigration accountability goals. The bipartisan framework and worker/grower support indicate a pragmatic compromise for the public good[4][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses critical vulnerabilities in election security by imposing transparency requirements on foreign contacts, expanding advertising disclosure rules to include digital platforms, and establishing criminal penalties for interference. These measures directly counter foreign attempts to undermine U.S. elections while maintaining First Amendment protections through careful targeting of prohibited debris activities. The deportation provisions for foreign nationals engaging in election interference align with existing immigration laws aiming to protect national security.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill strengthens public trust by mandating routine audits and disclosure of presidential tax returns, a measure critical for preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring financial transparency among elected leaders. The legislation includes safeguards such as redacting sensitive personal information, balancing accountability with privacy protections[1][4]. By institutionalizing these checks, it helps maintain ethical standards without compromising operational independence of the IRS[4]. The vote reflects a commitment to transparency as a public good.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill strengthens consumer protections under the Fair Credit Reporting Act by enabling direct access to credit tools, improving accuracy through audits, and establishing clearer dispute resolution mechanisms. The creation of a centralized portal and CFPB ombudsperson specifically addresses persistent barriers to fair credit reporting[1][2]. While its future implementation faces potential legal challenges (as seen in subsequent CFPB rulemaking)[5], the foundational provisions promote transparency and accountability in financial reporting systems.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Passing H.R.1443 promotes equitable access to credit by requiring financial institutions to collect data on lending to LGBTQ-owned businesses, which helps identify and address systemic disparities. This transparency aligns with efforts to ensure underserved communities can fairly access capital and participate in economic growth, supported by the Administration's commitment to equity[1][5]. The requirement maintains individual privacy by aggregating data through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rather than disclosing personal identities[4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill strengthens immigration law by closing gaps that allow repeat sex offenders and domestic violence perpetrators to remain in the U.S., which directly protects vulnerable populations. While the partisan sponsorship and focus on 'illegal aliens' raises concerns about potential overreach, the principle of prioritizing public safety through stricter accountability for violent crimes aligns with ethical governance. Existing deportation grounds for similar offenses lack clear application in all cases, necessitating legislative clarification for consistent enforcement.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 1187 promotes critical transparency measures through mandated disclosures on corporate ESG practices, political spending, tax strategies, and workforce investments. These provisions empower shareholders and investors to make informed decisions aligned with ethical and sustainable priorities. By establishing a Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee, the bill fosters coordinated guidance toward addressing systemic risks like climate change. While adding reporting requirements, the focus on material information balances regulatory burden with public benefit.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022 modernizes outdated fee structures to better align with current market sizes and economic conditions. By introducing a six-tiered fee system, it reduces costs for mid-sized mergers while increasing fees for larger deals, ensuring equitable resource distribution to antitrust agencies[1][3]. Annual CPI adjustments automate future fee updates, preventing legislative gridlock on antitrust funding[1][2]. The bill also enhances transparency by requiring disclosure of foreign subsidies in mergers, addressing potential unfair competitive practices[1][2]. These reforms strengthen enforcement capabilities to combat anticompetitive behavior, aligning with the administration’s commitment to fair markets and informed by bipartisan support in the finalized legislation[3][4].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While H.R. 7023 aims to reduce regulatory burdens and streamline permitting, it risks weakening critical environmental protections under the Clean Water Act. The Administration warns it would restrict community input and necessary environmental analysis, undermining efforts to balance infrastructure development with ecological safeguards. Given bipartisan concerns about conflicting with ongoing permitting reforms and potential harm to water quality, opposing this bill prioritizes long-term public health and environmental integrity.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

imeplementation of this bill would prevent federal agencies from reducing documented public health risks associated with lead ammunition. Scientific evidence shows lead fragments in game meat pose poisoning risks to humans and over 134 wildlife species (condors, eagles, bears)[3][5]. Existing bans on lead shot for waterfowl reduced wildlife deaths[2], demonstrating regulatory effectiveness. Blocking such restrictions contradicts proven conservation measures and elevates health hazards.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Supporting this bill aligns with preventing a catastrophic default on federal obligations, a critical action to maintain economic stability. The measure also extends essential funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs through FY24, safeguarding healthcare and support services for military members. While the bill's broader provisions (including regulatory reforms) warrant scrutiny, the nonpartisan urgency of debt ceiling management and veterans' funding justifies passage despite ideological disagreements[3][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The bill would undo pricing adjustments that targeted cost reductions for lower-wealth, creditworthy borrowers - a group critical to middle-class homeownership. Reverting to previous higher fees contradicts the goal of making mortgages more affordable. Additionally, the CBO estimates this would increase direct federal spending by $900 million annually, creating fiscal concerns[3][5]. The FHFA's original changes aimed to balance risk pricing with equitable access; this reversal risks undermining those objectives[3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill provides critical investments in transportation infrastructure, climate resilience, and environmental justice. It allocates $105B for public transit expansion and $110B for roads/bridges, modernizing aging infrastructure while prioritizing safety and sustainability[1][3]. The $1B Reconnecting Communities Pilot directly addresses systemic inequities caused by transportation barriers, promoting equitable access and low-carbon transportation options[3]. Additionally, the climate-focused allocations ($21B for environmental projects and $15B for EV programs) align with urgent national needs to reduce emissions and prepare for extreme weather events[3][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill aims to protect U.S. and allied personnel from International Criminal Court (ICC) investigations, such sanctions risk undermining global accountability for war crimes and human rights abuses. The ICC serves as a critical mechanism to address atrocities when domestic systems fail. The U.S. has historically opposed ICC jurisdiction over its citizens, but broadly targeting foreign entities aiding investigations could strain international cooperation and disproportionately retaliate against impartial judicial efforts[1][3][4]. Prioritizing political allies over multilateral justice mechanisms may weaken the global framework needed to deter future crimes.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Creating dedicated domestic terrorism offices in federal agencies enhances coordinated efforts to analyze and prevent violent extremism. The bill requires mandatory reporting on threats and focuses resources on significant risks without creating new legal powers or offenses. While concerns about potential overreach exist, the structural framework supports constitutional governance by channeling counterterrorism efforts through established legal frameworks[2][5]. Prioritizing public safety through improved interagency coordination aligns with national security interests amid documented domestic terror threats[1][4]

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Paycheck Fairness Act addresses systemic wage discrimination against women by closing loopholes in the Equal Pay Act, protecting workers from retaliation for discussing salaries, and requiring employers to justify pay disparities[1][2][4]. Despite controlling for hours and occupation, studies show a persistent 5-7% earnings gap that this bill aims to reduce, promoting economic parity[4]. By placing the burden on employers to demonstrate fair wage practices and training workers to negotiate equity, it aligns with ethical standards of fairness and workplace justice[3][4].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses systemic discrimination by guaranteeing reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers, closing loopholes that previously disadvantaged them compared to other protected employees. It promotes public good by supporting women's health, economic stability, and workforce retention while clarifying employer obligations. The requirement for accommodations unless proven an 'undue hardship' balances worker protections with business practicality[1][3][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Omnibus Low NOx regulation targets substantial NOx emission reductions (90% by 2031) that directly protect public health, particularly in ports and freight corridors[2][4]. While Congress’ authority under the Congressional Review Act remains legally contested – with the U.S. GAO affirming waivers aren’t ‘rules’ subject to CRA reversal[2] – approving HJR89 risks escalating federal-state conflicts without resolving underlying environmental imperatives. The regulation’s technical requirements (low-load testing, durability standards[1][4]) address real-world emission scenarios better than current standards. Blocking it may undermine multi-state air quality collaboration under Section 177 authorities, potentially worsening pollution harms before a substitute federal framework emerges.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

"While short-term SPR drawdowns have historically reduced gas prices (as seen in the 13-31 cent/gallon decrease following 2021 releases), the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is already at a 40-year low of 350 million barrels as of September 2023. This bill risks further depleting an emergency buffer critical for national security during supply crises. Increased federal land production should not be tied to SPR releases, as doing so conflates long-term energy strategy with short-term price manipulation. Maintaining a reliable SPR is essential for protecting against geopolitical disruptions and natural disasters that currently lack immediate market solutions." [3][5]

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill aligns with preserving U.S. energy security by restricting SPR sales to entities under CCP influence, preventing adversarial nations from accessing emergency petroleum reserves. It ensures strategic resources remain available for domestic needs during crises rather than supporting foreign geopolitical objectives. The measure addresses bipartisan concerns about China's growing reliance on oil imports and potential adversarial use.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Corporate Transparency Act strengthens national security by closing loopholes that enable money laundering and terrorism financing. Its requirements for beneficial ownership disclosure align with global transparency standards and provide law enforcement with critical tools to track illicit financial flows. While implementation complexities and compliance burdens exist, the public interest in preventing criminal exploitation of anonymous corporate structures outweighs these concerns.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Passing the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act modernizes protections against racial discrimination in voting, a fundamental safeguard of democratic integrity. It reverses detrimental effects of *Shelby County v. Holder* by redefining criteria for jurisdictions needing federal pre-clearance, ensuring states with problematic voting histories remain accountable[1][3]. This strengthens Section 2 litigation by expanding avenues to challenge discriminatory policies, critical after *Brnovich v. DNC*[5]. Protecting voting rights aligns with constitutional principles of equal protection and maintains trust in fair elections.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Hydraulic fracturing poses significant environmental and health risks, including groundwater contamination, methane emissions, and toxic air pollution[1][3][4]. Federal protections should retain flexibility to address emerging evidence of harm to drinking water supplies, wildlife habitats, and vulnerable communities[2][5]. While energy production is vital, long-term public health and ecological sustainability should not be compromized by preemptive bans on safety measures[3][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While respecting personal freedoms is important, the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers serves a critical public health purpose. It protects vulnerable patients in facilities where transmission risks are high, aligns with evidence-based practices to reduce severe illness, and has been upheld by the Supreme Court as a legitimate use of federal authority. Repealing it could exacerbate risks to both patients and staff during future pandemic phases, outweighing concerns about individual autonomy in this context.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill allows Byrne grant funds to support public safety report systems, which could enhance data-driven policing and better track violent offenders. By improving law enforcement’s ability to monitor high-risk individuals, it aligns with public safety priorities while maintaining existing accountability mechanisms for grant utilization[1][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill would improve wages for millions of low-income workers, particularly in sectors with tipped and young employees historically paid subminimum rates. The elimination of disparities for disabled workers advances equity. By staggering increases over seven years, businesses can adapt. While economic impacts vary by region (as GAO reporting would assess), the overall benefit to working-class Americans outweighs transitional challenges.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While the bill's goal to support smaller police departments is commendable, its narrow focus on agencies with fewer than 200 officers misses addressing systemic crime challenges in larger communities where most violent crime occurs[3]. The emphasis on training programs like de-escalation, while valuable, insufficiently prioritizes recruitment/retention initiatives for understaffed departments[3][4]. With crime rates rising nationally, targeted grants lack the scale and scope required for meaningful impact[2][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

HB7780 addresses critical gaps in mental health support by expanding school-based care, protecting workers’ benefits, and advancing research. Its focus on vulnerable populations (e.g., students with disabilities, LGBTQ+ youth, and homeless children) aligns with equitable access. The bill’s grant programs for workforce development and occupational mental health initiatives would reduce long-term healthcare costs and improve societal well-being.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Passing this bill would reverse critical protections for the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, risking irreversible ecological damage to a pristine aquifer that supports 15% of North America's freshwater biosphere. While the legislation aims to reinstate mining permits, it also eliminates judicial review of leases[1][5], potentially enabling projects that threaten water quality and public health. Environmental and economic analyses must prioritize long-term ecological preservation over speculative mining profits, particularly given the region's reliance on clean water for tourism, recreation, and commerce[2][4]. The Congressional budget analysis acknowledges high uncertainty about project viability and environmental impacts[5], making rushing this resolution premature.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill aligns with Title IX's original purpose to protect competitive opportunities for women by ensuring sports participation criteria remain grounded in biological sex. Current Title IX regulations already permit sex-based team divisions [2], and recent executive actions explicitly prioritize preserving women's sports through biological sex classifications [4]. Limiting eligibility to those assigned female at birth addresses documented cases where biological males have dominated women's competitions, undermining the equality Title IX seeks to guarantee [3]. This legislation clarifies compliance standards for schools, resolves conflicting interpretations between state laws and federal policy [1][5], and preserves fair athletic opportunities without creating subjective criteria that could erode Title IX protections.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses a humanitarian crisis by centrally protecting Venezuelans fleeing a collapsing state. It aligns with U.S. values of compassion, allows eligible individuals to legally contribute to the economy through employment, and includes strong public safety screenings. Passing TPS designation would prevent forced returns to a dangerous environment while maintaining immigration enforcement integrity.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 140 addresses a critical concern about federal employees' potential overreach in censoring viewpoints, aligning with First Amendment protections against government interference in speech. The bill specifically targets official actions that pressure platforms to suppress speech based on ideological perspectives, as evidenced by reports of such practices[1][5]. While some may argue about scope, the text of the law narrows restrictions to advocacy for viewpoint censorship, maintaining clarity about permissible speech oversight versus prohibited ideological targeting[2][3]. This distinction supports public good by safeguarding free expression while preserving necessary content moderation efforts.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While combating Social Security fraud is critical, this bill's provision allowing deportation without a criminal conviction undermines due process. Admitting to offense elements doesn't guarantee unlawful intent or context awareness, risking unjust expulsions. Public good requires balancing fraud deterrence with fair legal standards. The bill's current framework could disproportionately target vulnerable populations without proper judicial safeguards.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This legislation strengthens existing immigration laws by explicitly barring entry and enabling deportation of non-citizens who commit serious violent crimes like domestic violence or sex offenses. It aligns with broader public safety priorities by removing dangerous offenders from communities, particularly protecting vulnerable populations including women and children. While concerns about enforcement practices could apply to any immigration policy, the bill's narrow focus on genuine criminal behavior—rather than holding immigration status alone—makes this a reasoned approach to upholding safety and rule of law.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The American Dream and Promise Act aligns with core American values of fairness and opportunity. It provides critical protections for Dreamers—who contribute significantly to the U.S. economy while lacking secure legal status—and extends necessary humanitarian relief to Temporary Protected Status (TPS) recipients facing instability in home countries. By offering a pathway to citizenship through education or military service, it upholds the principle that hard work and public contributions merit protection. This approach balances accountability with humanitarian concerns while preventing family separations and fostering economic growth through continued workforce participation[3][4][5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Terminating the COVID-19 vaccination requirement for foreign travelers aligns with the subsequent policy shift demonstrated by CDC and executive actions in May 2023[3]. As pandemic circumstances evolve and global immunity improves, removing redundant measures preserves equitable access to international travel while maintaining public health flexibility. This legislative step complements evidence-based adjustments already underway[1][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill addresses the urgent humanitarian and security crisis caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine by providing $40.1 billion in emergency funding. The appropriations target critical areas including military assistance, refugee support, and economic stabilization, which align with both U.S. national interests in deterring aggression and global responsibility to protect vulnerable populations. The allocation to multiple agencies ensures a comprehensive response, and emergency designation follows proper protocols for crisis-related funding[1][2][5]. Blocking this aid would undermine Ukraine's ability to defend itself and exacerbate global instability.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Build Back Better Act addresses critical systemic challenges through targeted investments. It expands affordable child care and early education programs that support working families, while funding climate resilience projects to address environmental threats. Medicare expansion for hearing care benefits seniors, and paid family leave provisions improve workforce flexibility. Tax adjustments on high-income earners and corporations aim to fund these initiatives equitably, balancing fiscal responsibility with broad societal benefits that promote economic mobility and public health improvements.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 51 addresses a fundamental inequity: Washington, D.C. residents pay federal taxes, serve in the military, and bear civic responsibilities without full congressional representation. The bill provides a constitutional path to resolve this through its provisions for republican governance and equal footing with other states, while safeguarding federal interests (e.g., excluding monuments like the White House and maintaining federal jurisdiction over government operations)[1][2][5]. It also addresses practical transitions, such as temporary House seat adjustments and support for federal agencies during the statehood process[2][4]. These measures align with principles of taxation without representation and democratic participation, outweighing concerns about operational dependencies or constitutional debates that could be resolved via repeal of the 23rd Amendment[5].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 7688 addresses urgent consumer protection needs during energy emergencies by prohibiting unconscionably excessive fuel pricing that exploits crises. The bill empowers bipartisan enforcement through FTC/states while reinvesting penalties into energy assistance programs. This balance of market oversight and direct relief aligns with equitable emergency response principles.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill would unduly restrict the courts' ability to provide urgent injunctive relief that protects individuals or groups from widespread harm. By limiting relief to only parties in the specific case, it risks allowing systemic violations of rights or injunctions to circumvent accountability. While intended to prevent overbroad judgments, this proposal could hinder courts from effectively enforcing constitutional protections and lead to inconsistent legal interpretations across jurisdictions[1][2][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The For the People Act addresses critical democratic challenges: protecting voter access, combating foreign interference, reducing partisan gerrymandering through nonpartisan commissions, enhancing campaign finance transparency, and strengthening governmental ethics. These reforms promote electoral integrity, reduce corruption risks, and empower small-dollar donors—collectively advancing the public interest in fair representation and trustworthy governance.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill strengthens protections for federal whistleblowers by explicitly prohibiting retaliatory investigations, safeguarding their identities, and reinforcing their right to communicate with Congress. These measures enhance governmental accountability, protect ethical disclosures, and align with the public interest in exposing fraud or misconduct without fear of reprisal[1][4][5].

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

Blocking the Department of Energy’s proposed energy conservation standards for gas stoves risks undermining efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve public health. While consumer choice and cost concerns are valid, the bill prioritizes short-term convenience over long-term environmental and health benefits. Energy efficiency standards typically drive innovation without banning specific technologies, and stricter oversight could reduce indoor air pollution caused by gas stove emissions. Allowing the DOE to proceed with evidence-based regulations aligns with broader climate goals and public welfare.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism provides a widely recognized framework for identifying discriminatory behavior, which could enhance the effectiveness of federal antidiscrimination enforcement in education. By adopting this definition, institutions gain clearer guidelines to address harmful acts without suppressing academic freedom, as it explicitly distinguishes legitimate criticism of Israel from antisemitic conduct. This aligns with global efforts to combat antisemitism and supports universities in fostering inclusive environments.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While reducing regulatory burdens is important, this bill risks undermining critical energy efficiency progress. Refrigerator standards have historically driven technological innovation while lowering long-term costs through reduced energy consumption. The bill’s focus on prohibiting "net costs" to consumers in the short term overlooks the broader societal benefits of energy conservation, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved energy security. Maintaining rigorous standards aligns with addressing climate change—a pressing national priority—and supports sustainable energy practices.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

While affordability concerns are valid, energy efficiency standards typically account for lifecycle costs, balancing upfront expenses with long-term savings and environmental benefits. Blocking DOE’s authority to update dishwasher standards risks stifling technological progress and breeding short-term affordability gains at the expense of environmental and economic resilience over time. The bill’s premise assumes current/environmental standards are inherently unworkable without evidence from the provided materials justifying such a broad prohibitions.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

"H.R. 7888 strengthens oversight of U.S. surveillance practices by requiring FBI personnel to obtain prior approval for queries involving U.S. persons and eliminating the FBI Director’s authority to waive notifications to Congress about queries targeting elected officials. These reforms address longstanding concerns about potential overreach while maintaining critical national security tools. The five-year reauthorization ensures continuity in intelligence operations but imposes stricter safeguards to protect civil liberties. Enhanced transparency and congressional oversight align with the public interest in balancing security and privacy."

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

The Save the Internet Act of 2019 seeks to reinstate the FCC’s 2015 net neutrality protections, which prevented ISPs from throttling, blocking, or favoring content through paid prioritization. Repealing the 2017 "Restoring Internet Freedom" order restores fair competition, shields startups from ISP monopolistic practices, and ensures equal internet access—a cornerstone for innovation, free expression, and public utility[1][2][4]. While ongoing litigation (Mozilla vs. FCC) complicates the path, the bill prioritizes immediate consumer protections against potential ISP abuse of market power, aligning with the public interest in maintaining an open internet ecosystem[2][3].

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

H.R. 8873 strengthens electoral integrity by clarifying procedures for counting electoral votes, addressing vulnerabilities identified in recent elections. This bipartisan legislation aligns with constitutional authority under Article II and the Twelfth Amendment to safeguard democratic processes. Reforming outdated Electoral Count Act provisions enhances confidence in election outcomes.

Vote LLM

Yes

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

HB302 addresses critical gaps in protecting nonpartisan civil service integrity. By restricting arbitrary creation of new excepted service categories like Schedule F, it preserves merit-based hiring protections established under existing civil service laws. This prevents executive overreach threatening the apolitical administration of public programs, aligning with Hatch Act principles while closing loopholes that could enable political favoritism. Bipartisan support and endorsements from federal employee groups validate its necessity to safeguard neutral governance.

Vote LLM

No

Vote AOC (D)

No

Vote Mike Johnson (R)

No

LLM Justification

This bill risks undercounting residents in immigrant-heavy states by discouraging participation through a contentious citizenship question, potentially violating the 14th Amendment's 'whole number of persons' requirement for apportionment. It shifts political power toward states with fewer noncitizens, disadvantaging communities relying on federal funds tied to population. Legal challenges and operational complexities further undermine its effectiveness while threatening census accuracy[1][4].